On Donnerstag, 10. August 2017 18:40:34 CEST Christian Loosli wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 10. August 2017, 17:25:14 CEST schrieb Jonathan Riddell: > > LibreOffice are having a similar discussion > > > > https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/projects/msg02257.html > > > > They want to continue using IRC though which means fragmentation would > > continue. > > Maybe someone should inform them that there are bridges available to avoid > that. > > But maybe they'd simply ignore that, multiple times, and go on, as some > people seem to do in this thread as well *shrug*
Who ignored the possibility of bridges? Where does Martin Steigerwald's impression come from that people want to make this an "either/or decision"? The only person who seems to want to get rid of IRC is Jonathan, because he thinks bridges have a negative impact on the experience of both sides of them. I never said that. Martin Klapetek never said that. Yes, we both think that IRC is not suitable as the _only_ chat tool for a community in 2017. Why do people feel something is threatened without people threatening it? Puzzled, Thomas