On 1/27/19 11:39 AM, Ivan Čukić wrote:
I'm generally leaning against licenses like these - even if authors (of code, of art, etc.) allow us to forget them, I like giving credit where credit's due.
Just because the license *allows* non-attribution, that doesn't mean we have to not attribute them, right? In the patch in question [1] we are preserving authorship information. Seems like the nice thing to do even if the license doesn't require it.
Nate [1] https://phabricator.kde.org/D18078.
