On Sonntag, 10. November 2019 16:09:34 CET Luigi Toscano wrote: > Nate Graham ha scritto: > > Again, from a totally non-translation perspective, I am somewhat surprised > > to hear that individual translators are required to be proficient in a > > source control system. Perhaps de-coupling the workflow from direct > > interaction with the SCM would be beneficial? Isn't this what GUI apps > > like KLocalize do? If not, can it be modified to do the SCM interaction? > > This seems like a solvable problem. > > Most of translators are not so technical as the developers. And even > developers can shoot them in the foot with git, I see many issues coming > from unwanted merges.
GitLab allows editing files directly in the browser. Maybe that's an alternative to having to deal with an SCM-CLI. > Also, in addition to some of the problem described above (not all of them > are blocker IMHO), more relevant: how would you convert the SVN > repositories into git? > - a unique repository would be the easier way, and > required by people who do changes to all the languages (renamed and moves) > but I can only foresee tons of merging issues when committing (see above). Why do those merging issues not occur with svn? Regards, Ingo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
