On martes, 8 de septiembre de 2020 15:16:26 (CEST) Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 14:43:51 CEST Carl Schwan wrote: > > CC-BY-SA-4.0: this is the preferred license for the documentation but > > it is less problematic for sharing it, but it's still not a great feet > > for sharing it on a not FOSS related media. > > *.krita.org is currently CC-BY-SA-3.0, not 4.0, but that's just because we > didn't update it: > > https://krita.org/en/about/website/ > > We choose this because we explicitly do not want others to reuse the content > without worrying about copyright.
FWIW, dot.kde.org content is licensed under CC By 3.0, as is the content on YouTube (the only CC license available). I personally favour CC By SA, but I do not have very strong feelings about this as long as attribution is required. Cheers Paul -- Promotion & Communication www: http://kde.org Mastodon: https://mastodon.technology/@kde Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/kde/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/kdecommunity LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/kde
