On Freitag, 28. Mai 2021 12:36:35 CEST Andrius Štikonas wrote: > 2021 m. gegužės 28 d., penktadienis 11:25:49 BST Harald Sitter rašė: > > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:43 AM Sune Vuorela <nos...@vuorela.dk> wrote: > > > On 2021-05-26, Anna “CyberTailor” <cy...@sysrq.in> wrote: > > > >> After 36 months, the code becomes Apache-2.0 licensed (the conversion > > > >> period)> > > > > > > So you can use old sentry versions, which are open source. > > > > > > +1. I think we should support free and open source software. > > > > I do too. I'm curious though: How does using the 4 year old software > > support the software more than using the eventually 4 year old > > software? > > By the way, isn't it 3 year old software. That probably doesn't > fundamentally change the discussion. Although, if you use Debian stable or > Centos, you probably are using a lot of 3 year old software.
Sure, but in Debian and Centos security fixes (for officially maintained packages) are backported. Are security fixes backported for the now Apache-2.0 licensed versions of Sentry? Regards, Ingo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
