On Wednesday, 22 September 2021 03:57:37 PDT Jonathan Riddell wrote: > I think I'd be against adding it to the policy, the aim of the policy has > always been to keep it simple which licence to use so ensure code and be > swapped around within and outwith KDE with minimal worry about different > licences. Apache 2 doesn't add any useful use case to our licences that > isn't already covered by another one, it's just a bit more explicit about > the intended uses.
If we add it, I recommend we add instead "Apache2 OR GPL-2.0-or-later". It can't be Apache 2 only. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Software Architect - Intel DPG Cloud Engineering