Hi,

On Tuesday, September 16th, 2025 at 21:17, Ben Cooksley <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 6:47 AM Christoph Cullmann <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 

> > Hi,
> > 

> > 

> > On Tuesday, September 16th, 2025 at 20:36, Ben Cooksley <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> > 

> > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 3:07 AM Christoph Cullmann 
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > 

> > > > Hi,
> > > 

> > > 

> > > Hi Christoph,
> > > 

> > > > 

> > > > 

> > > > 

> > > > On Monday, September 15th, 2025 at 20:42, Ben Cooksley 
> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > 

> > > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 4:14 AM Christoph Cullmann 
> > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > 

> > > > > > 

> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > 

> > > > > > https://invent.kde.org/websites/kde-org/-/work_items/42
> > > > > > 

> > > > > > should now contain state of the lists we have.
> > > > > 

> > > > > 

> > > > > Thanks Christoph. The really sad part is people who have sent patches 
> > > > > or otherwise have been interested haven't received replies, and in my 
> > > > > mind that really justifies closure and redirection of those lists.
> > > > > 

> > > > > Does someone want to file some tickets and i'll then proceed with 
> > > > > closing down the dead lists?
> > > > > (noting where needed if a list should be merged into another list)
> > > > 

> > > > 

> > > > I am not sure what the best process is.
> > > > 

> > > > I would assume to close all lists that not had any mail since the last 
> > > > 2023 'are you alive' ping is save.
> > > > 

> > > > That is close to 2 years.
> > > > 

> > > > I guess mailman allows to re-open closed lists if ever the need arises?
> > > 

> > > 

> > > Depends on how I do the closure.
> > > 

> > > Normally when we close a mailing list we fully remove it, so the only 
> > > thing left behind is the list archives.
> > > That means the list of subscribers, etc. is fully purged.
> > > 

> > > If we were okay with reopened lists starting from scratch then that is 
> > > fine.
> > > 

> > > Otherwise we would have to delete the mail forwarding into Mailman but 
> > > leave the list itself still registered in Mailman and set the list to 
> > > hidden/private.
> > 

> > 

> > I would prefer the second choice.
> > For sure there will be a few lists that need reviving in the future and 
> > that would make it easier.
> > (and if I am wrong, which would be nice, I assume it is not that much more 
> > work)
> 

> 

> It's pretty low effort to create a list, the only downside is the loss of 
> subscribers - and for those dead lists there is a good chance some of those 
> emails are no longer interested anyway, so we would probably want to blank if 
> the revival came after any length of time.
> In the not too distant future we will need to move to Mailman 3, and i'd very 
> much prefer to only move over active things as part of that move.


Ok, then I can live with just killing the lists, too.



> > 

> > 

> > 

> > > > 

> > > > All other stuff needs in detail discussion I guess.
> > > > 

> > > > Is our mailing list mail server able to generate more graceful bounce 
> > > > mails that contain some generic contact info like
> > > > 

> > > > 'head to kde.org/xyz...'
> > > > 

> > > > for people that try some non-existing address?
> > > 

> > > 

> > > We can add entries to the blocked-destinations list to achieve some level 
> > > of customisation, however the sender will still receive back the bounce 
> > > email that would contain just that one line of text we can provide as 
> > > part of blocked-destinations.
> > > Anything else would require quite a bit more setup.
> > > 

> > > For most of the dead lists though we could forward them easily enough to 
> > > one of our existing lists which is probably a better user experience?
> > 

> > 

> > Good question, I would rather really get just a bounce, one never knows if 
> > not some old bugs point to them or other stuff and that
> > then ends up on the other list we point it to.
> 

> 

> Wouldn't this mean people like the person who did the Calligra porting work 
> would just see their email lost rather than sent to somewhere that has some 
> life?


I think that is the sad reality, but that one person got now from me a mail in 
person.

I don't think that will make people sad, they are sad already that in most 
cases they got no answer for years. A bounce is a much better answer than none
or ending on a totally different list.

Greetings
Christoph



> 

> 

> > 

> > Btw., all that stuff really cries for a gardening team :) ironic that that 
> > list is dead, too.
> > Perhaps one could revive that as GitLab team for all interested.
> > 

> > Greetings
> > Christoph
> > 

> 

> 

> Thanks,
> Ben

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to