On Wednesday 15 December 2010 11:37:51 John Layt wrote:
> That was always my assumption.  Which also makes me confused as to why
> promoting from private to public would break BIC, why should any change in a
> formerly private symbol break BIC when it is essentially deleting a private
> symbol and adding a new public one?  Unless that's another MSVC 'feature'
> we're working around?

I would guess that the problematic situations are actually protected -> public 
and when the method is called by an inline method.

Alex

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to