> On 2011-01-05 11:11:06, Andrea Diamantini wrote:
> > trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kdewebkit/kwebpage.cpp, line 98
> > <http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6183/diff/4/?file=43503#file43503line98>
> >
> >     I studied a bit the testing sites you gave me. I noticed that the 
> > download diff link in reviewboard does not work well with rekonq and 
> > konqueror (filename info NOT used). If I understood things well, the 
> > content-disposition header should be checked for filenames also having the 
> > "inline" value.
> >     So, something like:
> >     if(value.startsWith(QL1S("attachment"),...) || 
> > value.startsWith(QL1S("inline")...)
> >     
> >     I tested on rekonq code and it seems working.

Nope. kio_http will always ignore the file name parameter if 
content-disposition header contains the "inline" parameter. Even if the content 
sent is not something that user-agent can render, the file name should be 
ignored regardless. For example, for the inlwithasciifilename test at 
http://greenbytes.de/tech/tc2231/ you should not see the file name if you 
choose to click "save" when prompted. In fact, the correct implementation for 
inline content would be to display it embeded in the application whenever 
possible, but that is not something that can be done generically in kwebpage 
since not all application are KParts based.  Note, some browsers incorrectly 
use the "filename" parameter for 

BTW, I have now removed the code you quoted above, the one that does its own 
content-disposition parsing in kwebpage. It was a left over and unnecessary 
hack to workaround bugs in the kio_http's content-disposition parser. However, 
it is much better to fix the issues at kio_http level than to do this hack for 
sake of consistency in all KDE web rendering modules, not just those based on 
QtWebKit.


- Dawit


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6183/#review9527
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2011-01-05 06:21:31, Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6183/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-01-05 06:21:31)
> 
> 
> Review request for kdelibs and Andrea Diamantini.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> The attached patch fixes a long standing issue in the KIO-QNAM class where 
> actions that require putting an ioslave on hold currently do not work. In 
> kdewebkit, which uses this integration class, such actions always occur when 
> you click on a link that cannot be directly handled by the browsing engine. 
> For example, clicking on a link that points to a PDF link. Even worse is when 
> the link you click on results in an http POST which returns content. In such 
> cases, apps that rely on kdewebkit and hence the KIO-QNAM bridge class have 
> no way of putting an ioslave on hold as stated in KIO::get's documentation in 
> order to properly deal with content types they do not support.
> 
> The attached patch along with another pending against kio_http, 
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/6182/ , remedies this issue by adding a means to 
> put replies on hold and fixing the downloadResponse slot in KWebPage to do 
> the right thing.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kdewebkit/ISSUES 1211858 
>   trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kdewebkit/ISSUES 1211858 
>   trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kdewebkit/kwebpage.h 1211858 
>   trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kdewebkit/kwebpage.cpp 1211858 
>   trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/accessmanager.h 1211858 
>   trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/accessmanager.cpp 1211858 
>   trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/accessmanagerreply_p.h 1211858 
>   trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/accessmanagerreply_p.cpp 1211858 
> 
> Diff: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6183/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dawit
> 
>

Reply via email to