Can somone please clarify the proper rule to follow for committing bug fixes as it relates to the KDE 4.6 branch ? The conclusion from the discussion here is rather confusing as to what should be done going forward. Should we still commit new bug fixes to the 4.6 branch first and merge into master which, from all indications here, seems not to be possibe with the current state of the KDE 4.6 branch ? Or it does not matter now so we can go ahead and commit to master and backport to the branch if we so choose ?
- Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick? Andreas Pakulat
- Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick? Pino Toscano
- Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick? Dawit A
- Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick? Dawit A
- Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick? Stefan Majewsky
- Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick? Hugo Pereira Da Costa
- Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick? Johannes Sixt
- Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick? Hugo Pereira Da Costa
- Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick? Johannes Sixt
- Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick? Nicolas Alvarez
- Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick? Dawit A
- Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick? Aaron J. Seigo
- Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick? Tom Albers
- Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick? Michael Pyne
- Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick? Thiago Macieira
- Initial merge (was: Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick?) Johannes Sixt
- Re: Initial merge (was: Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick?) Thiago Macieira
- Re: Initial merge (was: Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick?) Andreas Pakulat
- Re: Initial merge Johannes Sixt
- Re: Initial merge David Faure
- Re: Initial merge (was: Re: Merge or Cherry-Pick?) Oswald Buddenhagen