On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Sebastian Trüg <tr...@kde.org> wrote: > > > On 03/08/2011 09:53 AM, Ivan Cukic wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> First of all, one thing to mention - KDE apps are not advised to use >> QtZeitgeist directly because that way the 'tracking' has no idea about the >> activities. >> >> File/resource tracking (and thus rating) should be per activity - as an >> example, there is no point in showing java docs that you used in >> 'Developing J2EE application' activity in a 'KDE development activity'. >> >> The classes that should be used are KActivity* which will soon enter >> kdelibs/experimental. >> >> The activity manager (the dbus service behind KActivity classes) will have >> both Zeitgeist and Nepomuk as backends. (both as optional deps) >> >> --- >> >> Zeitgeist vs Nepomuk >> >> Sebastian concluded that storing all the events in Nepomuk wouldn't be >> wise, so it was agreed to store them in Zeitgeist which was designed with >> that sole purpose. > > to be precise: I wanted to test storing all in Nepomuk first which I > have not done yet.
Does this mean you would want to give nepomuk this capability if the tests are successful? -Todd
