A Wednesday, May 25, 2011, Boudewijn Rempt va escriure: > On Wed, 25 May 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > A Wednesday, May 25, 2011, Aaron J. Seigo va escriure: > >> hi :) > >> > >> i just finished pushing a set of changes to the (ironically named?) > >> qt3support branch in kde-workspace which leaves no traces of qt3support > >> or kde3support left in that module. huzzah! > >> > >> i'm ok with holding on to the branch until 4.8, but if there is interest > >> in getting this into 4.7 it should be a fairly safe merge and would > >> allow distributors to ship kde-workspace without a dependency on > >> qt3/kde3support. > > > > Is there a real demand for this? > > Yes, I'd say there's a real demand. qt3/kde3 support takes space and > qt3-support doesn't exist on OSX anymore, and is going to disappear > everywhere else.
That's just facts, not saying who is demanding KDE 4.7 to have no qt3support. > After Qt 4.8, no Qt3 support anymore. Yes, but KDE 4.8 will come before Qt 5 does so that's a non issue too. > Best get it removed everywhere as soon as possible. Disagree, removing it for the sake of removing it, is just opening the can to bugs for no real reason. > (As well as QWidget/QPainter code, too, of course.) Hope you are really joking with this one. Albert > > Boudewijn