On Tuesday 7 June 2011 01:26:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure: > > Well, obviously a Tier 1 framework would have to use tr() instead of > > i18n() for its translation needs. > > Are we still going to use .po or you plan on us moving to Qt translation > files?
Well, I honestly don't know what awesome magic you used for libsolid, so for me it's "the same recipe". Note that it'll happen mostly for Tier 1 frameworks though. > > AFAIK that shouldn't be a big issue as libsolid > > is already in that situation. > > Yeah, and totally fails to follow KLocale setting of wheter to use KB, KiB, > etc. Right, however there's also a plan ATM to get the settings between KLocale and QLocale shared. John is working on that right now, so it depends a bit on the outcome, in any cases the situation is likely to improve on that particular point. > > We're aware that our own translation system > > provides more feature, but at the level of Tier 1 frameworks the user > > messages should be simple enough to get away with using tr(). > > I disagree, time and date formatting is anything but simple. If really needed it'll get into Tier 2 then, no big deal. Again, the graph presented is non exhaustive and makes some assumption about goals we set. If there's a blocker along the way we'll reevaluate, it's not meant to be read as done deal or set in stone. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.