On Monday, 25. July 2011 02:10:56 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Sunday, 24 de July de 2011 14:51:34 Gary Greene wrote: > > On Jul 23, 2011, at 10:33 AM, Martin Koller wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > can anyone answer the case https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277319 , > > > please ? > > Honestly, I really wish that Mozilla/KDE/Google/Wget/<insert FOSS group that > > has their own root certificate store here> would get together on fdo and > > create a common project that the root certificates could be aggregated at > > instead of each project doing it themselves... > > The answer is: STOP distributing our own certificates. Rely on Qt's support, > which also doesn't distribute certificates. The burden then falls on the > system > integrator (the distros), which will select a root CA package that they feel > confident about. > > They're also the ones who can roll out security updates directly to the > users. > We can't.
How does the resolution process work here in KDE - I mean: who has the final say that KDE stops (or doesn't stop) to deliver the certificates ? Can I close mentioned bko entry as INVALID or WONTFIX ? -- Best regards/Schöne Grüße Martin A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q: Why is top posting bad? () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments Geschenkideen, Accessoires, Seifen, Kulinarisches: www.bibibest.at
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.