On Sunday 21 August 2011 17:27:01 George Kiagiadakis wrote: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Lukas Appelhans <l.appelh...@gmx.de> wrote: > > Hey! > > > > Cool... I see you go for a split up of kdenetwork (makes sense imo). > > > > The problem I see at the moment you have to build all applications > > together in kdenetwork, otherwise they fail to compile. So this is a > > first thing which needs to change. > > It is not really required to build them all together. I used to have > git-svn clones of krdc, krfb and kopete and built them separately. > Actually, all the work I have done on krfb was done this way. Iirc > there is extra cmake code in there to ensure that they build both > standalone and all together. Okay. This is not true for KGet though: All searching for dependencies is done in the top-level CMakeLists.txt.
Lukas > > > What is missing are tags and branches right? > > > > Lukas > > > > PS: The KGet "svn cp" comment is (I guess) about this branch: > > http://websvn.kde.org/branches/work/make_kget_cool/?pathrev=647221 > > As far as I know this is the KGet2 rewrite and was copied to trunk > > then...> > >> I have partially written the rules for kdenetwork, but they are not > >> complete. I don't have time to work on them at the moment, so someone > >> else taking that over would be good if it's going to happen any time > >> soon. The work I've done so far is in the git repository with all the > >> other conversion rules. > >> > >> -- > >> George
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
