On Saturday 12 November 2011 11:14:35 Valentin Rusu wrote: > On 11/12/2011 10:11 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Any particular reason why you didn't stick to the separate repo solution > > as proposed earlier? For some reason I fail to see what motivated your > > change on that. > > Well, as I explained in other threads, the initial decision I understood > was to have the components in kdelibs and kde-runtime then. And I did > stick with that.
Yeah, I know that. > Please see my response to Aaron. And that's where my question comes from, I thought the consensus with the involved parties after that new discussion was for a new repository, but I might have missed something. So that was the intent of my previous email, now that the red flag got raised for inclusion in kdelibs master, why not going for a separate repository? At least contrary to inclusion in kdeutils it would avoid the circular dependency issue. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
