Valentin Rusu wrote: > Stephen Kelly wrote: > >> Kevin Ottens wrote: >>> There's three main reasons for this rhythm: > >> * KAction/QAction stuff - Don't know what's needed. If QAction needs new >> virtual method that would need to be determined soon. Is anyone driving >> that? Again, needs subtask here if it's going to happen: >> https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-20885 > > Well, I volunteered for this item but "real life/job" got a hold on me > since the last meeting. But now I'm getting more time for hacking. > > I wasn't aware about the QTBUG you linked us to. Thanks for that. And I > can tell I'm far from having a precise plan about KAction merge. But I'll > try to have one in a couple of weeks. >
Note that feature freeze of Qt is early February. There will be a feature window after that at some point, but it will become even harder to get anything in after that especially with no clear plan. Thanks, Steve.
