On 19.02.12 17:49:59, Parker Coates wrote: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:58, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote: > > I guess I should get used to using gitk. > > This is slightly off topic, but with all this talk of gitk, I thought > it'd be a good time to recommend QGit [1]. It's an alternative git > history viewer with a friendlier interface built on top of a certain > modern GUI toolkit that we all know and love. > > I agree that there is little sense in trying to learn git without > using a graphical log viewer. It quickly and intuitively answers the > question "What did I just do?", which tends to come up a lot when > beginning with Git. (For the "What am I about to do?" question, I > would recommend git-cola [2], which is a nice GUI for "git diff" and > "git add -p", among other things.)
And for those that like to stay in their terminal: git log can print graphs too: git log --graph Andreas