On Thursday 12 April 2012, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > On 12.04.12 21:01:53, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Sunday 08 April 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > El Diumenge, 8 d'abril de 2012, a les 17:13:54, Pau Garcia i Quiles va > > > > ... > > > > > > I can tell you TestComplete's support for Qt is pretty limited. I > > > > have not tested LDTP because we needed support for Windows and Linux > > > > for our Qt projects. > > > > > > > > Squish is the best tool we evaluated at work for Qt, it does support > > > > Qt Quick and there is a company maintaining it (Froglogic, founded > > > > by KDE developers and employing many KDE developers). A few more > > > > arguments pro-Squish: it's cross-platform (which means we can run > > > > the same tests on Linux, Windows, Mac and any other platform we > > > > support) and the client-server architecture is very useful when > > > > testing client-server applications, actual environments and/or using > > > > virtualization to run the UI tests after each daily build. > > > > > > Did you guys ever try Testability? I've been using lately and works > > > pretty well and has the added value of being Free Software. > > > > We use Squish at work and it works well. > > > > Beside that, there is a new project called QtTesting from Kitware which > > can be used kind of like Squish. > > > > It's still very new, and I haven't tried it myself. > > Really? The log dates back to 2005, thats quite old and even there the > first entry suggests its been split off from somewhere else.
Hmm, when Bill talked to me about it at FOSDEM this year I got the impression that it is quite new... Well, if it's already in use since years, even better :-) Alex