On Friday, May 25, 2012 11:14:17 Dominik Haumann wrote: > So it's probably non-trivial to create this patch (haven't looked into > it, though), a dead end as it's Qt4, and unclear, whether such a patch > would be accepted at all in the Qt 4.x line, given that the focus is > on Qt5 now.
And it's unclear, whether a jsc update would fix the issue, btw :-) Dominik