On Friday, 2013-01-04, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > random ramblings: > > i don't like the recommendation for extracted vs. disambiguating > comments (and closed-source authors will typically do the exact opposite > anyway).
The opposite thing as in only having comments and not caring at all about ambiguity and that it makes the translations of their software suck? If so, why should we care? We offer the options of doing it better and have recommendations based on more than a decade of large scale i18n. Is there any reason at all other than lazy programmers to even have i18n functions that are not i18nc variants (i.e. require a comment)? Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.