On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:14:37PM +0100, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > We are not talking about the same things. We have three parts here: > * locking of screen (no keyboard, no mouse) > * not exposing screen content > * unlock dialog > > to me the lock screen is "locking the screen plus not exposing the screen > content", while unlock is completely unrelated. The old implementation had > the > "not exposing screen content" as a screen saver.
Ok, I see where you're coming from now. > well if they got it right, it's right, isn't it? Just that GNOME did > something > doesn't mean it's wrong. Given your remark it sounds like that which would be > very sad. Yes, but that something is right is pretty much orthogonal to Gnome doing it, which is why I balked at you dragging them in at all. But, useless thread. Everyone (including us) have screensavers now, everyone are happy. -- Martin Sandsmark
