On Thursday 11 July 2013, andrea diamantini wrote: > What about a single official development branch? > Just use two branches: > - master branch (stable) > - kdevel branch (devel) > You develop wherever you like and push things on "kdevel" branch when > ready. If you like the "one branch approach", you devel things directly in > kdevel branch. > People knows there are just 2 important branches: master and kdevel. One > people per project can think merging from kdevel to master when things are > "ok".
Do we have enough such maintainers ? Alex