hi ... just replying to k-c-d because i loath massively-cross-posted email discussions.
On Thursday, December 12, 2013 11:46:53 Vishesh Handa wrote: > Each of these problems is independently solvable without RDF. ah, how wonderful. what you describe is amazingly similar to the system Wheeler and I came up with during the very first Akademy. if you’re ever interested in what ever became of that, remind me over a coffee/beer sometime and i’ll put on my old-man pants and recount the ol’ days. ;) > After a month of designing the solution and a month of implementing it, > Baloo > is working way better than Nepomuk does. So, I'd like to switch to Baloo by > default in 4.13, while keeping Nepomuk in maintenance mode for more > conservative distributions. how does one switch to Baloo in a sane fashion? (so we can help test and perhaps even work on integration elsewhere. i don’t care about migration ..)) what is the Baloo equivalent of the Nepomuk API currently in kdelibs? (i’ve looked in the ballo repo, it isn’t clear at first glance) > This is not a completely new project as large parts of Baloo code are > derived from Nepomuk and therefore comes with years of testing and real > world use. i’ll say it again here so that it is at least on record: i really disagree with renaming Nepomuk. call it Nepomuk 2 or whatever, but tossing aside name recognition and years of messaging is doing the promo teams a massive disservice. i hope that Baloo remains a technology name well hidden from both users and developers. > Migration - There will be an automated migration mechanism for migrating > tags, > ratings and comments from Nepomuk to Baloo. cool > Another thread can be started about its different aspects once > you've read the basic ideas behind Baloo i’ve done so and even looked briefly at the code. where do you want the discussion to occur? i have some technical questions already :) -- Aaron J. Seigo