On Tuesday 24 December 2013 21:25:37 Ivan Čukić wrote: > > As I understand it there are no plans to remove the nepomuk-core or > > nepomuk-widget libraries. If you switch to Baloo, anything compiled > > against > > nepomuk will still run but will act as if nepomuk is disabled. This is > > something clients previously had to cope with anyway. > > Meaning that everything* that uses nepomuk now (fortunately, not much) will > stop working properly. > > Either that, or we will have to keep both systems running in-parallel. > > * except the parts Vishesh ports over :) > > I would like baloo to be available in 4.x, with no API stability guarantees, > so that it can mature for 5.x series. I am not sure about pushing it as a > nepomuk replacement just jet. As I see it, the nepomuk maintainer says it works better than Nepomuk for all cases covered by SC. I don't see any reason not to move forward then.
> Vishesh, how possible would it be to have dolphin (and others) with support > for both nepomuk and baloo? I don't know details but ofc it is possible, but I doubt we have the manpower to do it (it will take longer and it will require more maintainership).