El Divendres, 24 de gener de 2014, a les 15:59:12, Vadim Zhukov va escriure: > 2014/1/24 Sebastian Kügler <se...@kde.org>: > > On Friday, January 24, 2014 01:24:54 Vadim Zhukov wrote: > >> in the best case you'll have two totally different codepaths > >> that you'll have to manage. > > > > This should be "worst case", I think. In the best case, there's xattr > > support, meaning another code path isn't needed. > > It's doubtful at least whether xattr support is a good thing, because > it's too easily gets misused: for example, there were viruses on > Windows which effectively hidden themselves in NTFS streams. And there > are personal data leaking issues I've pointed out earlier. But the > question "xarttrs: to be or not to be everywhere" is totally offtopic, > because it's what OS developers should decide. > > The worst case is Nepomuk becoming a crashy resource hog again, which > will turn in cutting it off or disabling by default in most OSes.
This last sentence doesn't help at all to get you treated seriously. Cheers, Albert > > -- > WBR, > Vadim Zhukov