Hi David, > I don't want to start a naming bikeshed so if it is already too late > to consider renaming, just dismiss these comments: No, that's still okay. Nothing is set in stone yet. > > The first thing I thought of when I read the name of the plugin is > that it did graph rendering, like OGDF QML[0], and I was in desperate > need for such a library a couple of months ago. I think graph is > confusing for a couple of reasons:
> > * There is already a concept of graphs associated to QML, as in QML > Graph Scene (which is apparently the most common result I get from > searching "QML Graph") Never thought about that. > * In KDE, Rocs deals with Graphs and KmPlot deals with these kinds of > graphs. * There is a Qt Charts[1] thing that does something similar. > > So I would consider renaming this to something with plot/chart. I like charts better and would consider renaming it to kqmlchartsplugin. The QML import would be 'org.kde.charts' then. Are there any more opinions on the naming issue? > > David E. Narvaez > > [0] https://github.com/schulzch/qml-ogdf > [1] http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2013/06/19/qt-charts-1-3-0-released-2/
