On Thursday 19 June 2014 17:07:49 Elvis Angelaccio wrote: > 2014-06-18 18:50 GMT+02:00 David Faure <fa...@kde.org>: > > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 16:27:43 Elvis Angelaccio wrote: > > > Hello, > > > in the last two months this thread has not been updated, so I assume > > > that > > > the Kronometer UI is ok. > > > What is still not clear is whether to move Kronometer in extragear-utils > > > > or > > > > > kdeutils and until this decision is not reached I can't file a sysadmin > > > request to exit from kdereview. > > > > > > At the moment, in this thread there is one "vote" for extragear-utils by > > > Albert and one for kdeutils by David. > > > There is another thread in kde-utils-devel list where there is another > > > > vote > > > > > for extragear-utils: > > > https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-utils-devel/2014-April/001110.html > > > > I don't mind either way, it makes very little difference in the end > > ("sudo zypper install kronometer", done) > > > > In fact the real question is what do *you* want: do you want it released > > automatically as part of the KDE SC, or do you want to make your own > > releases > > (more work for you, but you control when it's released). > > Well, what I really care for is packaging and translations, the release > schedule is secondary.
It's not just about schedule, it's about who does the work. > I'm not sure how exactly extragear works. Let's say I choose to move > kronometer in extragear-utils: the many distros will automatically package > it? Yes, that's not where the difference is. > What about translations? No difference there either. The difference is: will you take care of doing regular releases of the code (versionning, packaging, uploading, etc. etc.). Or would you rather that this happens automatically for you whenever a KDE SC release comes out. -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE Frameworks 5