> On Sept. 20, 2014, 10:20 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > CMakeLists.txt, lines 225-234
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120287/diff/3/?file=313626#file313626line225>
> >
> >     tabs instead of whitespaces
> 
> René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>     I looked into those yesterday, and cannot find tabs on my end. No idea 
> where they'd come from.
> 
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>     I'd guess the editor you use changes it somehow. I'd suggest to use Kate 
> and enable show all whitespaces.
> 
> René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>     No, really, those tabs aren't there. I re-reopened the CMakeLists.txt in 
> vi (which doesn't modify anything unless I ask for it) and there are no tabs 
> to be found. Same in KDevelop when I open the patch review tool. I wonder if 
> your editor isn't the culprit, or something on reviewboard?
>     
>     I copied the .reviewboardrc file from another KDE project and edited the 
> obvious settings. I see nothing concerning tabs in there, but maybe there 
> ought to be?
> 
> René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>     See my local copy of the diff I just added.
> 
> Thomas Lübking wrote:
>     There're no tabs in the diff (checked teh only reliable way: okteta ;-)
>     
>     Indention in those files is crazy (2 or 3 chars, never 4), what makes it 
> look like WS/tab intermix, but ">>>" seems only a RB indication that the line 
> was altered only by shifting.
> 
> René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>     Just a question: would I still have triggered `-pedantic` mode if I had 
> included something like "and relevant code tidy-ups" in my RR title? :P
>     
>     Also, is one supposed to go through an RR for each and every tidy-up one 
> might want to commit (now that I have commit access ...)?
> 
> Thomas Lübking wrote:
>     You can stuff as many patches (commits) into one review as you like, just 
> that one patch may delay the "ship it" to all others than and at some point 
> ppl. will refuse to look at 3MB of patches at once ;-)
>     
>     I don't think that pure tidy up commits belong into KDE4 at all, if you 
> really consider one necessary, better have it reviewed.
>     
>     For KF5/master you ideally clean up code while editing the area anyway.
>     Global astyle fixes should only be done when things become too much of a 
> mess - and be shown to the maintainer.
>     (Reason is that you introduce "fences" to "git blame")
> 
> Marko Käning wrote:
>     Reason being that "fences" to "git blame" get introduced is a very good 
> point, indeed! (Never thought of that, actually.)
>     That's somewhat a problem of the SCM's way of handling the code lines 
> then!
>     Would be cool if white-space commits could be marked as such, so that git 
> could omit/bridge them in case of blame...
> 
> Christoph Feck wrote:
>     The >>> markers reviewboard shows are not Tabs, but change in indentation.

> would I still have triggered -pedantic mode if I had included something like 
> "and relevant code tidy-ups" in my RR title?

you triggered the -pedantic mode for me (which is always kind of on), because I 
consider the change as dangerous, thus I think it must be absolutely 
side-effect free and in a way that reviewers can focus on the actual changes.

Sorry about the whitespace complains, that must be a recent change in 
reviewboard - at least I have never seen it before.


- Martin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120287/#review67023
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 20, 2014, 12:54 p.m., René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120287/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 20, 2014, 12:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Software on Mac OS X and kde-workspace.
> 
> 
> Repository: kde-workspace
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> A few rather straightforward patches to make the relevant bits of KDE4's 
> kde-workspace build and function on OS X.
> The main interest is having the systemsettings control panel to control the 
> various relevant KDE settings among which desktop search, fonts, colours and 
> even style.
> The oxygen style builds and looks good but shows some updating glitches due 
> to compositing.
> 
> I'm submitting this patch partly in hope it may be useful in bringing 
> kf5-workspace to OS X, one day.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt 195f99c 
>   kcontrol/CMakeLists.txt fc666b1 
>   kcontrol/krdb/krdb.cpp 36fc99c 
>   kcontrol/style/CMakeLists.txt d832b20 
>   libs/CMakeLists.txt c0576fe 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120287/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> On OS X 10.6.8 and 10.9.4 with KDE/MacPorts (4.12.5 and more recently kdelibs 
> git/master, 4.14.1).
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> copy of the diff file saved locally, which had no tabs when I uploaded it. 
> Checksum: 3989cdd46af3c891e570974d66c330403dcd41c4ee5e17a372fa385080cbabd1 
>   
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/09/20/b212730f-6258-4277-851c-226bc0673aa1__patchreview-20140920.patch
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> René J.V. Bertin
> 
>

Reply via email to