Hi! On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:12:07 +1300 Ben Cooksley <bcooks...@kde.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > As promised in the earlier thread, i'd like to present the sysadmin > report on the state of the infrastructure surrounding our code. > > It contains a detailed summary of what is broken with our existing > systems, why change is necessary and an evaluation of the options we > considered. We have also made a proposal based on our evaluations and > the wishlist of functionality drawn up the community. > > Please find it attached - and let us know what you think. Feedback is > welcome.
Thanks a lot for all your hard work. I think Phabricator definitely looks much more newcomer-friendly on the surface than Gerrit, although, knowing there is a web-form available for uploading diffs to Gerrit (will that handle follow-up patches, too?) goes quite some way in addressing the entry barrier issue. But beyond review functionality, I think moving towards a more integrated solution is clearly a step in the right direction, and this is what makes the choice of Phabricator over Gerrit a clear case to me. Also, definitely a huge thank you to Jan for investing so much work in the Gerrit setup. Clearly that was in the hope of making Gerrit the solution of choice, and I think we can all feel your pain, if that is not going to be the case. But I don't think it would be the right way to go for KDE. Regards Thomas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
