El Dimecres, 18 de febrer de 2015, a les 11:50:01, David Rosca va escriure:
> > If it's an expected situation, handle the situation.
>
> I have modified the tests (only the ones who would fail) so they will
> be skipped if Bluez 4 is detected.
Still failing here
4: Test command: /home/kdeunstable/qbluez/build/autotests/adaptertest
4: Test timeout computed to be: 9.99988e+06
4: ********* Start testing of AdapterTest *********
4: Config: Using QtTest library 5.4.0, Qt 5.4.0 (x86_64-little_endian-lp64
shared (dynamic) release build; by GCC 4.9.2)
4: QWARN : AdapterTest::initTestCase() BluezQt: GetManagerJob Error: "Rejected
send message, 2 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.145" (uid=1003
pid=10596 comm="/home/kdeunstable/qbluez/build/autotests/adapterte")
interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.ObjectManager" member="GetManagedObjects" error
name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination="org.bluez" (uid=0 pid=556
comm="/usr/sbin/bluetoothd ")"
4: FAIL! : AdapterTest::initTestCase() '!initJob->error()' returned FALSE. ()
4: Loc: [/home/kdeunstable/qbluez/autotests/adaptertest.cpp(76)]
4: PASS : AdapterTest::cleanupTestCase()
4: Totals: 1 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted
4: ********* Finished testing of AdapterTest *********
4/6 Test #4: bluezqt-adaptertest ..............***Failed 0.01 sec
test 5
Start 5: bluezqt-devicetest
5: Test command: /home/kdeunstable/qbluez/build/autotests/devicetest
5: Test timeout computed to be: 9.99988e+06
5: ********* Start testing of DeviceTest *********
5: Config: Using QtTest library 5.4.0, Qt 5.4.0 (x86_64-little_endian-lp64
shared (dynamic) release build; by GCC 4.9.2)
5: QWARN : DeviceTest::initTestCase() BluezQt: GetManagerJob Error: "Rejected
send message, 2 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.146" (uid=1003
pid=10597 comm="/home/kdeunstable/qbluez/build/autotests/devicetes")
interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.ObjectManager" member="GetManagedObjects" error
name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination="org.bluez" (uid=0 pid=556
comm="/usr/sbin/bluetoothd ")"
5: FAIL! : DeviceTest::initTestCase() '!initJob->error()' returned FALSE. ()
5: Loc: [/home/kdeunstable/qbluez/autotests/devicetest.cpp(96)]
5: PASS : DeviceTest::cleanupTestCase()
5: Totals: 1 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted
5: ********* Finished testing of DeviceTest *********
5/6 Test #5: bluezqt-devicetest ...............***Failed 0.01 sec
>
> I have also renamed the library to BluezQt. Here is an updated
> documentation: http://david.rosca.cz/bluezqt-apidocs/html/
>
> David
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Thiago Macieira <thi...@kde.org> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 February 2015 23:00:15 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> >> > It doesn't have the DBus
> >> > ObjectManager, so that call should fail like that.
> >>
> >> Well, then the test should try to detect it and QEXPECT_FAIL, havign
> >> tests
> >> fail means something is bad, and as you say it's not bad, just expected.
> >
> > QEXPECT_FAIL is when you know it's wrong but either can't solve it or
> > can't do it now.
> >
> > If it's an expected situation, handle the situation.
> > --
> > Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
> >
> > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
> >
> > PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
> > E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
