On Wednesday 22 April 2015, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > On April 22, 2015, 12:40 a.m., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > > I think this should go to Qt (I think it's quite difficult they will > > > accept it, as Qt4 is in hard freeze mode), and they will probably ask > > > to see if it applies to Qt5 as well. We just mirror Qt... not sure how > > > to handle this. > > > > Luigi Toscano wrote: > > Yes, I know you wrote that it should go to Qt, just stating that I'm > > not sure how to handle this patch in our Qt mirrors. > > > > Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > +1, we shouldn't go about maintaining a patched Qt4 fork. > > > > Ben Cooksley wrote: > > Our Qt mirrors are configured to be exact copies of the upstream > > code.qt.io mirrors, therefore any patches have to go through Qt > > Project to form part of our mirrors of it. > > It didn't even cross my mind to commit this patch to the Qt4 fork, just to > put it up for review (and make it available publicly). > > Oh, and if someone were to beat me to putting this up on Qt's code review > site, I'd actually appreciate that, a lot even O:-) > > Similar changes are already in Qt5. At least the font weights are greatly expanded in 5.5.
`Allan