On Sunday 27 March 2016 09:21:01 laurent Montel wrote: > Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 10:57:18 CEST Ben Cooksley a écrit : > > Hi all, > > > > As part of the CI overhaul, we've attempted to perform a complete set > > of builds for Qt 4, as it's still (unfortunately) used. > > > > Sadly, as expected for something nobody has really tried to build for > > ages, many things don't build. > > One of those is the entire PIM suite - because Baloo removed it's Qt 4 > > build metadata (meaning as far as the CI system is concerned, Baloo > > has no Qt 4 branches and is Qt 5 only) > > > > You've two options here: > > 1) Drop Qt 4 PIM. > > 2) Reinstate Baloo's Qt 4 branches. > > > > I intend to carry out option #1 if there is no response to this. > > I vote for #1 too. > We will not create more release from kdepim4, no distro uses it even debian :)
The latest openSuse (Leap 42.1) ships the Qt4 based kdepim, although it uses plasma5 desktop. Speaking of it: given that openSuse decided against shipping KF5-based PIM, how stable is KF5-based PIM considered these days ? Is it ready for productive daily professional use ? -- Best regards/Schöne Grüße Martin A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q: Why is top posting bad? () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ - against proprietary attachments Geschenkideen, Accessoires, Seifen, Kulinarisches: www.lillehus.at