On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Harald Sitter <sit...@kde.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote: >> In the old days it had kdelibs development discussion but not that that has >> moved over to kde-frameworks-devel, waht's kde-core-devel for? > > *cough* > http://markmail.org/thread/opcvfo5h7elrvqdl > > Everyone kinda agrees that there's one list too many between > kde-core-devel and kde-frameworks-devel. Someone needs to file a > sysadmin ticket and that person gets to decide whether kde-core-devel > gets killed in favor of kde-frameworks-devel (and kde-devel) or vice > versa. Discussing this is nothing but a bikeshed waste of time. > > kde-core-devel is an overly generic name. It being generic makes it an > attractive dumping ground for just about anything that seems even > remotely relevant to more than one development team, which is weird as > there's probably lots of devs that aren't even subbed here (anymore). > The way I see it kde-frameworks-devel has a specific discussion topic, > kde-core-devel does not. It may have in principle at some point been > about kdelibs but those days are long gone, probably in no small part > due to its naming. kde-core-devel should be done away with, sending > all kdelibs relevant topics to kde-frameworks since the knowledgeable > people hang out there. General development discussion should happen on > kde-devel as is already happening anyway. Release discussion should > happen on release-team. If any topics are then left out in the cold we > can open a new list kde-devel-community for random stuff that the > developer community wishes to discuss. > > (FTR: this list gets konqueror reviews. very core :-/)
Hi, this thread seems to have stalled a bit. Can we please reach some consensus on this? I'm still seeing people discussing whether that particular topic should go to k-c-d or <insert ML here>. I fully agree with what Harald said. Let's just kill k-c-d and go on with our lives. We already have all the MLs we need. Cheers, Elvis > > HS