> On Feb. 16, 2014, 9:12 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Alexander, did you see David's comment? Do you plan to implement what he > > suggests?
Hi, I think Konqueror is kind of unstable for now, and Chromium is a good enough alternative, thus will not spend more time on this. - Alexander ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101343/#review49935 ----------------------------------------------------------- On May 12, 2011, 10:55 a.m., Alexander Potashev wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101343/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 12, 2011, 10:55 a.m.) > > > Review request for KDE Base Apps and David Faure. > > > Repository: kde-baseapps > > > Description > ------- > > konq-plugins/domtreeviewer builds without there functions. > > May be these functions were left for future integration of domtreeviewer > undoable commands' into Konqueror's undo stack. But for now, they only add a > few translatable strings the user won't ever see. > > > Diffs > ----- > > konq-plugins/domtreeviewer/domtreecommands.h df8272e > konq-plugins/domtreeviewer/domtreecommands.cpp e4c7fff > > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101343/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > konq-plugins/domtreeviewer compiles after this change. > > > Thanks, > > Alexander Potashev > >