Ben Cooksley ha scritto: > -- Structure -- > > Following lengthy discussion in the original thread, it was agreed > that the original sysadmin proposal of various categories would be > implemented, with repositories organised according to that structure. > > You can find this documented at > https://cgit.kde.org/sysadmin/repo-metadata.git/tree/projects-invent?h=bshah/invent
I went through the list of the new structure, and I can only imagine the work needed to reshuffle Am I still on time to propose some fine tuning? == Proposed moves: kio-upnp-ms: applications -> network mark: applications -> education kdecoration-viewer: applications -> sdk kolorfill: applications -> games klook: applications -> graphics peruse: applications -> graphics == A bit more open questions about: libkdegameai: libraries -> games (like libkdegames) macports-kde: sdk -> packaging (not 100% sure) kup: system -> utilities (like kbackup!) mangonel seems a bit of place too in system (which has mostly lower-level configuration stuff), maybe utilities? == There are a few second-level namespaces, are we going to keep them? I can see: * graphics/digikam/ - it only contains digikam-doc, which should maybe just go under graphics/ * graphics/libs - a few libraries which be moved under graphics/ directly (or libraries, but they are graphics-related) * network/telepathy - only telepathy-logger-qt, it could go under network/ directly * others/kde-edu-courses/ - why not directly under education ? Also unmaintained/ contains two of them (necessitas, strigi), but it doesn't matter much I guess. Ciao! -- Luigi