I think it's clear we need some sort of process documentation for KDE
Review, who is expected to do what, and in which order.
I've cc'd Thiago on this as they are KDE's documentation writer, let's
see if we can get something together.
On 3/10/23 07:42, Carl Schwan wrote:
On Monday, 2 October 2023 21:53:06 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote:
This method of review is really sub-optiomal.
Who checked all those marks? There's no way to know.
Was it someone expert in the area?
Was it someone that knows has no idea what the checks mean?
Or was it the submitter of review? If it's the submitter for review it's
worthless (nothing against Carl, you're great) but one doesn't review their
own MRs, so one shouldn't probably review this kind of checks either.
I now unchecked all the checkmarks. For me I see these checkmarks as stuff I
need to do before sending a mail to kde-core-devel, as it is just the basic
stuff and it doesn't make sense to request a review if this is not done.
Cheers,
Carl
