Sebastian Change of plans. As per recent discussions with tsdgeos and kde_pepo on #kde-devel -
They would like to avoid too many new repositories. So, if it's okay with you we'll keep the nepomuk-kde-config and nepomuk-kde-kio code in kde-runtime, while the rest can be removed as it is there in nepomuk-core. If you have the time to port some of the stuff to Nepomuk2 it would be nice, otherwise I'll take care of all of it tomorrow. Good Night On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Vishesh Handa <m...@vhanda.in> wrote: > > Does anyone have suggestions on where nepomuk-kde-kio and > nepomuk-kde-config should be placed? > > I was thinking under kde-baseaps, but that might not be correct. Any > suggestions? > > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Kevin Krammer <kram...@kde.org> wrote: > >> On Thursday, 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg wrote: >> > I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus >> > interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are >> > supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces... >> >> I think as long as you didn't advertise the D-Bus interfaces as a kind of >> public API, e.g. by installing D-Bus introspection XML files, that should >> be >> fine. >> >> Cheers, >> Kevin >> >> > >> > On 05/17/2012 09:19 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: >> > > On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa <m...@vhanda.in> wrote: >> > >> @Packagers: We will not be maintaining binary compatibility in >> > >> nepomuk-core. At least not for KDE 4.10. We still need to break a >> lot of >> > >> things. >> > > >> > > NACK. >> > > >> > > this is a completely no go. >> > > >> > > /Sune >> > > >> > >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to >> > >> unsubscribe << >> >> -- >> Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer >> KDE user support, developer mentoring >> >> >> >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to >> unsubscribe << >> >> > > > -- > Vishesh Handa > > -- Vishesh Handa
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<