On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 12:49 AM Luigi Toscano <luigi.tosc...@tiscali.it> wrote:
> Jonathan Riddell ha scritto: > > I noticed the below change from Laurent about ruqola describing it as a > "KDE > > client". It would be much better not to pidgeon hole apps as being "for > KDE", > > users don't care what widget toolkit they're written in or what desktop > the > > app author uses, apps should work equally well on any desktop. Even > "client > > for" is confusing tech-speak. I'd rather a description like "Talk to > > colleagues and friends over the Rocket Chat network". > > > > Isn't that the description which ends up on invent? That's targeted to > developer (so tech-speak is good). > While it is the description that ends up on Invent yes, it should still be consistent with the way we market/describe ourselves. Describing it as a "KDE client" is therefore incorrect. These descriptions may also be found by potential contributors (who aren't coders - think documentation people, etc), so having a more user-friendly description is probably better in the long run. > > On the other hand the metainfo file may need to get some fixes. > > (I still disagree on the notion of "client" being tech-only, though). > > Ciao > -- > Luigi > Cheers, Ben