On Sat, 25 May 2024 13:02:41 +0200 christ...@cullmann.io wrote: > Now that frameworks is QDBus free on Windows and macOS I would even > propose that in a next update of the stuff we really not have QtDBus > around at all on these systems and make the use optional for the apps > that want to support them. > > We go to great lengths to avoid that dbus stuff is ever called, even > deleting the dll and the most freezes you will get if that is not > done is just dbus related. > > It would be great if people could join the effort to get that right. > > https://invent.kde.org/packaging/craft-blueprints-kde/-/issues/17
Asking mostly out of curiosity, but do you have a link to a writeup / thread on the problem, and / or suggested replacements? I noticed before that you were skeptical of dbus on Windows over at kate, but since it essentially seemed to work for us in RKWard (for the very limited use-case of reusing a running instance), I never bothered to follow suit. Now I see how you replaced dbus for that use-case in kate, and I guess that'll be easy enough to copy. But if dbus is something to avoid (where possible) in the interest of present and future cross-platform compatibility, some generic guidance might be helpful. Regards Thomas
pgpI8Ow1aM7FX.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
