On 18/05/2025 16:41, Albert Vaca Cintora wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2025, 08:59 Justin Zobel, <jus...@1707.io> wrote:
If the contributor cannot tell you the license(s) of the code that
was used to generate the code, then it's literally gambling that
this code wasn't taken from another project by Gemini and used
without their permission or used in a way that violates the
license and opens up the KDE e.V. to litigation.
I'm no lawyer but I would expect that training AI will fall under fair
use of copyrighted code. If that's not the case already, it will
probably be soon. The benefits of AI to society are too large to
autoimpose such a roadblock.
Albert
From my understanding (what others have told me), AI generally does not
produce good quality code though. So how is that a benefit to society?
