Hi, On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Adriaan de Groot <groot at kde.org> wrote: > On Friday 03 October 2008 23:20:12 Adriaan de Groot wrote: >> Should be push >> more aggressively for updates to the baseline nv (that would mean I would >> have to upgrade more than once a year, too). > > That was meant to be "Should *we* push ..". Basically, is our selection of > acceptable nv versions still ok? Are we finding problems due to trying to > support all three of S10 and nv70 and nv98? >
I think, my opinion .... we should support S10 as much as possible. That's clear. Nevada ... I'm not sure ... I think that we should be on the edge... take care about a few last builds. I think that 97 is fine. I would like to jump over just a few builds, i.e next build on my laptop should be 100 and then probably 104 (which plained for Xserver 1.5.1). Build like nv70 are very obsolete these days and minimal users have those builds. Another thing is pretty high double effort in packaging for Nevada. Many dependencies are in Nevada integrated. I know some of those are not in our configuration, but some of those are usefull. Luc -- Lukas 'Luc' Oboril IRC nickname: luc^ at freenode When dealing with people, let us remember we are not dealing with creatures of logic. We are dealing with creatures of emotions, creatures bristling with prejudices and motivated by pride and vanity. Dale Carnegie
