It's particularly annoying for non-contributers who are themselves trying to build specific KDE parts. This is why I mention lack of transparency. I understand you can't keep up with every single patch used since KDE is such as mess to manage as it is, but so far I'm almost completely dependent on Sun to produce working binaries, which hasn't happened even for the parts they say they have successfully made work already. If it were on Dillion I could ask for access and download all the pieces without incident to my own B9X machine. Thanks.
James On 6/30/08, Adriaan de Groot <groot at kde.org> wrote: > > On Sunday 29 June 2008 18:06, michael schuster wrote: > > btw: the list of necessary patches is documented on techbase, IIRC. > > > It's very incomplete and inconsistent list though, because it's hard to pin > down -- and it also wobbles because of nv variations. I think my nv91 > builds > are so poor because not all of the patches that i had on my nv83 machine > have > applied. > > Possibly we should collate our list of patches installed on dillon (which i > consider our official build machine) and on stefan's S10 box (ditto) with > the > official CBE / funny SWAN compiler. > > > _______________________________________________ > kde-discuss mailing list > kde-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/kde-discuss/attachments/20080630/d8fab836/attachment.html>
