Joerg Schilling wrote: > Brian Cameron <Brian.Cameron at Sun.COM> wrote: > >>> So, why use GDM instead of KDM then? Other than "because it's there" ? >> If someone wants to make KDM support Solaris, I think that would >> be great. As I explained, I think a11y support was the main reason >> we picked GDM over KDM initially. > > From my understanding, this would either need a binary standard for C++ > or a way to define a different LD_RUN_PATH for gcc compiled binaries. > But the latter would not share all code in memory.
kdm is written in C, not C++. --Stefan -- Stefan Teleman Sun Microsystems, Inc. Stefan.Teleman at Sun.COM
