Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Thursday 13 December 2007, John Sonnenschein wrote: >> The fully qualified dtrace probe for this would be something like: >> libstdcxx::__Z4swapIiEvRT_S1_:global-swap-TArg-TArg-entry >> >> which I find to be a lot nicer than >> libstdcxx::__Z4swapIiEvRT_S1_:entry > > Why not replace the mangled name with your decoding suggestion only? > > libstdcxx::global-swap-TArg-TArg:entry
as has been stated elsewhere, that's not possible (or so it seems at the moment); I'd suggest this: libstdcxx:::global-swap-TArg-TArg-entry (and the corresponding -return). Whatever the function name is can then be ignored. Would that work? I'd find it *very* unlucky, and a hurdle to use of DTrace, if the mangled names had to be used. regards Michael -- Michael Schuster Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
