On Wednesday 09 October 2002 14:18, Lauri Watts wrote: > On Wednesday 09 October 2002 10.06, ?ric Bischoff wrote: > > Is it okay to stop updating the English documentation (apart from > > kcontrol)? Lauri? Any important last minute changes as Jonathan seems to > > be suggesting? > > Plenty :) I could have another two weeks, and still not get this all done > :) > > If I can I just have the rest of this day to get what I can of the really > glaring things sorted out? (I can tell you what they are too, KStars, > Kooka and KOrganizer, all have some updates almost finished.)
As I'm answering the next day, yes, I retroactivly give you the Wednesday to finish that ;-). > > Also, about the patches that people will be starting to send to you, > > Lauri, will they go to KDE 3.2 (HEAD) or KDE 3.1.1 (BRANCH)? My vote goes > > for them going to HEAD. > > That will mean the branch documentation is never up to date with the > applications. > > I would like to put these patches also into the BRANCH one time only, as > soon as it is created. In the branch there is a lot of time for > translation for the 3.1.x versions, and if the HEAD version is already > translated, it will be much less work - and if it's not, nobody will notice > the difference. That will give non-English speakers the opportunity to > have translated *and* up to date documentation. That makes sense. Okay with me. However I don't know if it's a good idea to keep the branch evolving long after the tagging. I tend to consider the branch rather as a mean to fix important problems detected after the release. I may be wrong. -- ?ric Bischoff KDE : ad expugnandum tabulam scriptoriam suam
