On Wednesday 16 October 2002 12:01, Frederik Fouvry wrote: > | Sure, it might work as an example. > | > | Would en/user.entities do the job? > | > | PS of course, as we are in a doc freeze, it would be for after the > | tagging. > > Sure. If the entities are to be used systematically, I would > like to put it in separate files, for everyone.
Why not ? Have a look at the way we did it for French. For each person, we defined three entities : - that person marked up as a translator in ROLE_OF_TRANSLATORS - that person marked up as a proofreader in ROLE_OF_TRANSLATORS - that person and email in CREDITS_FOR_TRANSLATORS Of course, if there's a weay to avoid that replication by some kind of magic, it's better. I don't know if it's possible. > I propose > "writer.entities", both for language dependent and independent > person entities. "contributor.entities" ? Would be less tied to writing. -- ?ric Bischoff KDE : ad expugnandum tabulam scriptoriam suam
