On Thursday 16 September 2004 11:06, Cornelius Schumacher wrote: > > Actually, I don't like to-do that much, so I asked them about using > > task instead of to-do, but didn't get any response (except for bo on > > kde-pim, who also liked task more): > > http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-doc-english&m=109465274717333&w=2 > > I also would like "task" better, but I don't have very strong feelings > about it.
Okay, so basically all (or almost all) korganizer and groupware developers favor "task". Are the people on kde-doc-english okay with changing all to-do to task, and all sub-to-do to sub-task (or subtask?)? > > Actually, in several places we use to-do, while in others we use > > task. I think this should also be made consistent. > > Where do we use "task"? kogroupware.cpp: lines 614/615 libkcal/incidenceformatter.cpp: several places kmail/kmgroupware.cpp Also, korganizer's documentation talks alot about tasks (even about "To-Do task due date"... Wow, that's quite a tongue-twister with all these "t" and "d" in there.). Reinhold -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-doc-english/attachments/20040916/169d871e/attachment.sig
