Hi, I think now would be a good time to start thinking about what directions we want to take for KDE 4 with regards to documentation. This could range from "Keep doing what we do now, but recruit more people" to, well, whatever your imaginations can come up with :-).
There are plenty of ways we can look to improve the documentation, from literally writing more of it, to changing the procedures and structures we use, improving the tools we use to make it, and the tools used to view it. Some of these will require co-ordination with other groups (coders, usability, etc), but we can work that out later. For now, let's leave off thinking about practicality and implementation details (a dangerous thing to say, I know), and discuss what you'd like to improve. When we have a set of ideas, we can decide which are practical given the available resources, and which we're going to pursue for KDE 4. I'll post my ideas in a separate message. Regards, Philip -- KDE Documentation Team: http://i18n.kde.org/doc KDE Documentation Online: http://docs.kde.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-doc-english/attachments/20060404/50d4bc02/attachment.sig
