Matthew Woehlke wrote: > Davide Bettio wrote: >> SVN commit 1041284 by bettio: >> >> GUI: Improved UI layout. >> >> M +19 -43 oxygenconf.ui > > What is the rationale for this change? It makes the dialog very tall > (at a time when vertical space is at an ever increasing premium), and > moving the general options outside a groupbox makes them not line up > with everything else. > > (The previous version adding a Tabs groupbox is making the dialog a > bit unnecessarily wide, however, IMO. I vote we move that one option > to General, and restore the previous layout with Scrollbars and Menu > Highlight side by side. This will make the dialog a little wider but > much closer to the original height. Proposal attached.) Hi Matthew, Not really willing to interfere, I still would like to mention that this config window will likely be revamped if I put in animations in the style, because of additional options. (and I don't think the current layout can handle one additional groupbox) I was thinking of using tabs rather than groupboxes. See e.g. http://www.kde-look.org/content/preview.php?preview=1&id=112652&file1=112652-1.png&file2=&file3=&name=Nitrogen-style
What do you think ? Would that be an acceptable design ? I was also thinking, on the long run of something fancy like what the skulpture style has ... maybe. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > kde-usability mailing list > kde-usability at kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability >
